Relationship with the Other
Gospels
There is an interesting relationship between the
Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke. The similarities between the
three are so striking, most modern scholars accept that some sort of
a literary relationship between them exists. The most likely
explanation is that Mark wrote his Gospel first; Matthew and Luke
then added on to it. Indeed, Luke begins his Gospel by acknowledging
prior written sources ("Many have undertaken to draw up an account,"
1:1) and further acknowledging that he drew from these sources
("since I myself have carefully investigated," 1:3). These three
Gospels have been dubbed the "Synoptic" Gospels, in that they can be
compared side-by-side. Not only do they contain parallel teachings
and narratives, but said passages are often identical
word-for-word.
It is these similarities which make the Gospel of
John unique, and a bit of an enigma to scholars. Absent from John's
Gospel are stories so prevalent in the Synoptics: Jesus' baptism, His
transfiguration, the parables He told, the words of institution at
the Last Supper--indeed, a cursory reading of John almost gives the
impression that the Last Supper is absent altogether. Not found in
the Synoptics, yet prevalent in John, are lengthy and important
discourses, popular and powerful miracles (such as turning water into
wine or the raising of Lazarus), a farewell discourse which spans
several chapters, and the reinstatement of Peter after his denial of
Jesus. Even when we find parallels between John and the Synoptics,
there are notable differences as well: John goes into considerable
detail about John the Baptist not found in the Synoptics; while we
don't see the calling of the Twelve (apostles), we do see much more
attention given to individuals within the Twelve (Peter, Andrew,
Philip, and Thomas); like the Synoptics, John tells the story of the
feeding of the five thousand, but only John tells us that this was
near the time of Passover, and only John tells us that in relation
with this miracle does Jesus declare Himself the "bread of life"
(6:35).
If a literary connection exists between the
Synoptics, the question with John is this: was John written
independent of the Synoptics (i.e., John was essentially
unaware of their existence), or was John written with the Synoptics
in mind? The latter seems the better explanation, for at least five
reasons:
--Generally Mark, the earliest of the
Synoptics, is dated around 70 A.D.--and a strong case can be made
for an even earlier date. Matthew and Luke were written not long
after this. John, on the other hand, is generally dated in the
90's. This provides more than enough years for the Synoptics to
circulate, and for John to become familiar with them.
--Several statements in John presuppose
knowledge of events that are recorded in the Synoptics. For
example, John 3:24 makes a parenthetical mention of John the
Baptist's imprisonment, apparently assuming the reader is already
aware of the event (even though John has not recorded it; see Mark
6:17). In 11:2, John identifies Mary as the woman who "poured
perfume on the Lord and wiped His feet with her hair," even though
he has not yet told this story. However, the story would already
be known to those familiar with the Synoptics (see especially Mark
14:9).
--Some differences between the Synoptics and
John are best explained not as John writing about different
events, but rather as John providing extra information, or
clarifying information, from the Synoptics. For example, the
Synoptics would seem to portray Peter and Andrew as accepting
Christ's sudden call without a moment's hesitation (see Mark 1:16
- 20). John 1:35 - 42, however, tells us that not only did Peter
and Andrew have some lead time to make this decision, but also
that John the Baptist had given Peter and Andrew a strong
endorsement of Jesus.
--Other differences are best explained as a
reflection of changing circumstances. John offers some of the
strongest polemics against Jewish leadership of all the Gospels.
However, polemics by the Jewish leadership against Christianity
had likewise been increasing: Judaism even introduced a curse
against Christianity into its liturgy. Furthermore, at the time of
John's composition we see hints of emerging Gnosticism, a
religious belief which would try to adopt--and distort--orthodox
Christianity. John's polemics against Gnosticism are stronger in
his epistles (1st - 3rd John), but they are evident in the Gospel
as well.
--Early Church tradition confirms that John's
Gospel was meant to be a supplement to the Synoptics, aware of
what the Synoptics had already provided. Eusebius, in his
Ecclesiastical History, quotes Clement of Alexandria in saying:
"Last of all John, perceiving that the bodily [or
external] facts had been set forth in the Gospels, at the
instance of his disciples and the inspiration of the Spirit,
composed a spiritual Gospel."
Miracles, Discourses, and
Festivals
Much like the Synoptics, John is filled with
stories of miracle-working and didactic (teaching) discourses. In
John, however, the discourses are usually in conjunction with a
particular miracle; John calls these miracles "miraculous signs," and
indicates that they are meant to instill faith on the part of the
disciples. Furthermore, the miracles serve certain Christological
purposes--to demonstrate an aspect of the identity of the
Christ.
In addition to the link between miracles and
discourses, there is also prevalent in John various Jewish Festivals.
As we shall see, Jesus' famous "I am" statements are given not only
in conjunction with a particular Festival, but indeed are meant to
demonstrate that Jesus is the fulfillment of that particular
Festival. It is, again, a Christological focus John gives: who the
Christ is often will be demonstrated in conjunction with a miracle,
and as a representation of the fulfillment of Festival. The didactic
discourses further illuminate these principles.
This is the background of the Gospel of John. Our
study begins in earnest next week. An outline is available
here.
See you then!
In Christ,
--Pastor Dan
If you have anything of interest to add to
this site,
or you have general comments, questions, or ideas,
we welcome your
response.
Pages Created by
Dan Russell
copyright � 2003 - 2018
Last modified date: January 1, 2018