1:19 - 28--Who John is
Not
The author of the Gospel moves from the prologue
to a more detailed narrative centered upon John the Baptist. The
careful reader gets the sense that the author felt the need to clear
the air, if you will, about John the Baptist--and so the narrative
begins with the Baptist saying, in no uncertain terms, that he is not
the Christ, nor Elijah, nor the Prophet.
The Gospels are unanimous in conveying that John
the Baptist pointed away from himself and to the coming Christ with
his classic line about "one more powerful than I" whose sandals he
was not fit to touch (Matthew 3:11, Mark 1:7, Luke 3:15 - 16).
However, Acts 18:24 - 25 shares with us a brief comment that may
allude to a growing historical situation:
"Meanwhile a Jew named Apollos, a native of
Alexandria, came to Ephesus. He was a learned man, with a thorough
knowledge of the Scriptures. He had been instructed in the way of
the Lord, and he spoke with great fervor and taught about Jesus
accurately, though he knew only the baptism of
John."
We find a similar situation in Acts 19, in which
Paul finds Ephesian disciples who only know John's baptism. Though
John clearly pointed to Jesus as the Messiah (and will do so in the
verses to come), he still continued his own ministry, and it seems
clear said ministry continued--and spread--after his death. Perhaps
in the intervening years between John the Baptist's death and the
composition of John's Gospel, some began to exalt John as Messiah. If
so, the author of the Gospel wishes to state, in no uncertain terms,
that John was neither the Messiah, nor did he ever fail to confess
this point.
His answer to the next question, however, is odd.
Since he is not the Christ, is he Elijah? The Baptist's answer here
is "no"--however, this seems to be at odds with the Synoptic
accounts. Matthew and Mark both have Jesus telling His disciples that
John the Baptist was the Elijah figure, and Matthew has it twice
(Matthew 11:14, 17:10 - 13). Is this Gospel at odds with the
others?
It is better on this point not to think of John's
Gospel as being at odds with the Synoptics, but to think of John's
Gospel as a clarification of the Synoptics. This is the first of many
times that the Gospel of John gives us unique details and testimony
that seek to make clear statements which had previously been
published in the other Gospels. Similarly, because the Gospel of John
was likely written several years after the Synoptics, the author
finds it necessary to address a different audience and context. If,
as we speculate above, a following of John the Baptist has
exaggerated his status, then this Gospel will correct it. And if a
following of John the Baptist has misunderstood his nature, then this
Gospel will clarify it.
To wit: Messianic expectations of the day included
a prophecy from Micah 4:5, in which God promises to send the prophet
Elijah before the day of the Lord. When John denies being the Christ,
the next question goes to this expectation: is he, then, Elijah? The
same speculation was directed towards Jesus (Matthew 16:14, Mark
8:28, Luke 9:19). In regards to the Baptist, he himself says no;
Jesus says yes. Did John the Baptist underestimate his ministry? Or
was the author of this Gospel trying to dispel another exalted
status?
The latter seems the more likely explanation.
Jewish expectations of the time were for a literal, bodily Elijah to
return. Luke clarifies John's role in 1:17 by stating that John came
in the "spirit and power" of Elijah, not as Elijah himself. Whereas
earlier testimony about John the Baptist identified him as an Elijah
figure, the Gospel of John must make clear that John is "an
Elijah," so to speak, not "the Elijah."
The third refutation of John the Baptist's
identity is that of "the Prophet." It is generally accepted that this
refers to a prophecy made by Moses in Deuteronomy 18:15 - 19, in
which it is foretold that another prophet--another Moses,
essentially--will come. Once again, the Baptist is clear: he is not
that prophet.
The Gospel then goes to present the Baptist in his
traditional role: the precursor to Jesus Christ. He takes for himself
the prophecy of Isaiah 40:3, "the voice of one calling" (in the
desert). When asks why he baptizes (after all, he is not the Christ,
Elijah, or the Prophet), the Baptizer again points to his role as one
who prepares the way for Christ.
See you next week!
In Christ,
--Pastor Dan
If you have anything of interest to add to
this site,
or you have general comments, questions, or ideas,
we welcome your
response.
Pages Created by
Dan Russell
copyright � 2003 - 2018
Last modified date: January 1, 2018